top of page

TTD DIDNT DO THEIR BEST MNST SHOWS WHY THEYRE BETTER THAN THE REST


Quick emoji TL;DR (fast snack)



  • Monster (MNST) — 🔥 Beat & big pop. Strong margins. Crowd: buy-ish vibes.

  • Block (XYZ) — 💳 Raised guides, margins looking better, S&P inclusion tailwind. Still growth-stocky.

  • Pinterest (PINS) — 📌 Revenue beat but choppy reaction — growth story with high PE; analysts split.

  • fuboTV (FUBO) — 📺 Surprise beat, first positive adjusted EBITDA — still subscriber risk.

  • Wendy’s (WEN) — 🍔 EPS beat, cut guide — operational headwinds in U.S. but franchise cash flow.

  • Main Street Capital (MAIN) — 🏦 Modest beat, steady dividend/metrics — income/credit sensitive.

  • The Trade Desk (TTD) — 🤯 Beat but guidance worries + heavy downgrades — big sell-off (competition fears). Watch out.

  • Under Armour (UAA/UA) — 📉 Miss/weak guide + tariff hit = big sell-off; restructuring noise.

  • Gladstone Land (LAND) — 🌾 Missed FFO, revenue lag — looks weakest here.


Ranked list (best → worst)


  1. Monster (MNST) — 1 (best)

  2. Block (XYZ) — 2

  3. Pinterest (PINS) — 3

  4. fuboTV (FUBO) — 4

  5. Wendy’s (WEN) — 5

  6. Main Street Capital (MAIN) — 6

  7. The Trade Desk (TTD) — 7

  8. Under Armour (UAA) — 8

  9. Gladstone Land (LAND) — 9 (worst)


(Reasoning: rank uses earnings surprise, guidance, fundamentals, and how durable the business looks.)



Deep dives — one-by-one (emoji + facts + quick verdict)



Monster Beverage —MNST🟢🔥


What happened (Q2): EPS $0.52 vs consensus ~$0.48 (beat); revenue $2.11B vs $2.08B — beat. Stock jumped (+9% intraday / strong).

Why market reacted: Solid beat + strong margins; beverage businesses with brand pricing power often get re-rated when results beat.

Fundamentals (snapshot): PE ≈ ~36 (Macrotrends recent), strong net profit margins (~20%+ historically), low leverage vs peers.

Analyst view / PTs: Zacks ranks it as a Hold (Zacks Rank #3) as of the story, consensus views generally positive but not unanimous.

Big holders: Vanguard, BlackRock, major mutuals — typical institutional backing.

Short / mid / long term:


  • Short: Bullish — earnings beat often sparks momentum.

  • Mid: Neutral–Bullish — stable category, but category trends matter (consumer staples).

  • Long: Bullish if pricing/distribution intact.


    Verdict: Buy if you want a defensive-ish consumer growth name with solid margins; Hold for conservative investors.


Block —XYZ(formerly SQ) 💳🚀


What happened (Q2): Gross profit/gross-profit growth beat and then Block raised 2025 gross profit guidance (to something like $10.17B from prior ~ $9.96B). Management called out resilience in spending; Cash App/Square segments both contributed. Reuters/Yahoo coverage highlights guidance raise.

Price reaction: Shares moved up on the guidance/beat and S&P inclusion chatter (Block added to S&P 500 recently).

Fundamentals: Current PE varies by data feed (Macrotrends shows mid-to-high 30s recently; debt/equity low–modest, P/FCF variable). Block remains a growth-at-scale fintech with crypto/cash-app exposure — so multiples reflect growth premium.

Analyst view / PTs: Mostly Buy/Overweight from a plurality of analysts; price targets raised by several shops (TD Cowen, KBW, etc.). Not unanimous (some keep Neutral).

Big holders: Vanguard, BlackRock, T. Rowe Price, etc. (institutional heavy).

Short / mid / long term:


  • Short: Positive (beat + guide).

  • Mid: Cautiously bullish — depends on Cash App monetization + merchant trends.

  • Long: Depends on crypto/regulatory cycles + continued consumer adoption.


    Verdict: Buy/Hold depending on risk appetite — beat + guide lift confidence; still a growth name (not a value play).


Pinterest —PINS📌✨


What happened (Q2): Revenue beat (growth ~16.9% YoY in that report), ad product improvements showed up; some mixed signals on ad CPMs and user metrics; the stock experienced volatility (sell-off in some live coverage).

Why: Solid top-line growth but high valuation (PE in high double-digits / 80s in some feeds) means any “risk” (guidance or margin softness) can cause outsized moves.

Fundamentals: PE is very elevated (Macrotrends shows ~80+ recently), profit margins volatile but some quarters show strong profitability. Low leverage generally.

Analyst view / PTs: Mixed — TD Cowen, Rosenblatt, Bernstein and others have Buy/Outperform calls with PTs in the high-$30s / $40s; others trim targets or take Neutral. Average PT ~ low-$40s per aggregated sites.

Big holders: Vanguard, BlackRock, T. Rowe Price, etc.

Outlook:


  • Short: Volatile — depends on ad demand and CPMs.

  • Mid: Growth story if ad product execution continues.

  • Long: Could reward patient investors if monetization stays strong — but high starting multiple increases downside risk.


    Verdict: Buy for growth-tolerant investors who accept valuation risk; Hold if you’re cautious.


fuboTV —FUBO📺📈


What happened (Q2): Revenue/paid subscribers roughly matched/exceeded guidance. Reported positive adjusted EBITDA for the first time and EPS beat expectations (EPS ~+$0.05 vs small negative estimate). Revenues ~$371–380M depending on outlet.

Why market reacted: Beat and positive adjusted EBITDA is a real milestone for a growth/streaming name — but subscriber declines in North America cloud the shine. Stock reaction mixed (some headlines reported a modest dip as investors parsed subscriber trends).

Fundamentals / ratios: Fubo has historically negative margins but is improving; debt/equity moderate (~0.48ish per Macrotrends), cash balance improved; first positive adjusted EBITDA is meaningful.

Analyst view / PTs: Some bullish calls given path to profitability (but the pending Hulu-related deal and pause in guidance make modeling tricky).

Big holders: Typical institutional mix (Vanguard, BlackRock and various funds) — but it’s still a smaller-cap streaming story.

Outlook:


  • Short: Sentiment can flip quickly (subscriber metrics matter).

  • Mid: If EBITDA stays positive, buyout/partnership talk could re-rate it.

  • Long: Depends on consolidation in streaming space.


    Verdict: Speculative Buy if you want a turnaround/streaming-risk play (watch subscriber trends).


Wendy’s —WEN🍔😬


What happened (Q2): EPS $0.29 vs est $0.25 — beat; revenue ~$560.9M (small beat) BUT company cut FY profit guidance and same-store sales in U.S. were weak. Stock reaction mixed — the beat helped but lowered guide keeps pressure.

Why: Restaurants are sensitive to traffic and promo; beating one quarter but cutting guide tells you systemic softness in U.S. comps.

Fundamentals: WEN historically has franchise strength but some balance-sheet oddities (debt metrics look odd in some feeds because of franchising accounting). Dividend yield not meaningful like a utilities REIT — more of a cash-flow franchised restaurant play.

Analysts / holders: Trian (activist) is a big investor; Vanguard/BlackRock large institutional holders.

Outlook:


  • Short: Weak comps = headwind.

  • Mid: If marketing/tactical changes restore U.S. traffic, could recover.

  • Long: Franchise model gives durable cash flows — but operational execution matters.


    Verdict: Hold unless you think new ops strategy will fix U.S. traffic.


Main Street Capital — MAIN 🏦📈


What happened (Q2): Revenue ~$144M (beat ~4.9% vs est); EPS ~$0.99 in-line with expectations. Business slowed a bit but investment income categories grew; Zacks Rank = Hold.

Why: BDC/credit-like firms are interest-rate and credit-cycle sensitive; modest beat but not dramatic.

Fundamentals: Low leverage (debt/equity ~0.12 recent), steady dividend history (appeals to income investors), P/E etc. are moderate for a BDC/SMID. Macrotrends/stockanalysis has ratio tables.

Big holders: Institutional funds — Vanguard/BlackRock among typical names listed on holders pages.

Outlook: Conservative income play; performance tied to portfolio credit quality and interest environment.

Verdict: Hold / Income — ok if you want dividend + moderate growth.


The Trade Desk — TTD😬🚨 (big red flag this week)


What happened (Q2): Reported revenue ~$694M (+19% YoY) and adjusted EPS ~$0.41 (around estimates). BUT guidance was cautious and management comments plus competitive pressure (Amazon) spooked the market — stock plunged ~30–38% after-hours. Multiple analysts cut ratings/targets (Bank of America cut target massively to $55).

Why: Ad-tech is competitive; Amazon and walled-garden ad channels make investors worry about growth sustainability. Guidance slower than prior quarter’s growth fueled panic.

Fundamentals: Historically high PE (Macrotrends shows triple-digit PE recently) and strong profit margins vs peers — but high valuation means guidance misses are punished.

Analyst view / PTs: Heavy downgrades and price-target cuts across the street (some shops cut PT drastically; a few still defend the company).

Big holders: Vanguard, Baillie Gifford, BlackRock, Edgewood, etc. institutional heavy.

Outlook:


  • Short: Bearish (sell-off).

  • Mid: Risky — needs to show it can compete vs Amazon & keep ad dollars.

  • Long: Could recover if ad budgets shift back and Trade Desk defends open-web ad value — but high risk.


    Verdict: Avoid / Wait — unless you’re chasing a deep-value turnaround and accept high volatility.


Under Armour — UAA / UA👟📉


What happened (quarter): Revenue $1.134B; adjusted EPS tiny (miss/low); company warned of tariff impacts ($100M impact mentioned) and cut guidance (expecting YoY revenue decline in some periods). Stock plunged heavily (double-digit %).

Why: Tariff shock + weak US demand + restructuring charges = real pain. Management flagged tariff costs & restructuring items.

Fundamentals: PE in low- to mid-20s recently; leverage varies; historically volatile margins. Institutional holders include Vanguard, BlackRock and BDT (big stake).

Outlook:


  • Short: Bearish (guidance weak).

  • Mid: Risky — depends on consumer demand and whether cost cuts stick.

  • Long: Could rebound if brand re-acceleration works, but not low-risk.


    Verdict: Sell / Avoid for most retail investors until guidance/stability returns.


Gladstone Land —LAND🌾🔻 (weakest here)


What happened (Q2): Reported an FFO loss (-$0.10) vs est +$0.03 (big miss); revenue also missed (~$12.3M vs est ~ $16M+). Shares fell.

Why: Land/REIT FFO misses matter because investors buy REITs for stable cash distributions — a negative FFO surprises distributions outlook and trust.

Fundamentals: REIT metrics — leverage and FFO depend on seasonal/ag price cycles and farm rental deals; in this report the numbers disappointed.

Big holders: Institutions (normal mix) — holdings data on Yahoo / Nasdaq / Fintel.

Outlook: Cautious — this is the most beaten-up name in your list.

Verdict: Avoid / Watch — needs clearer FFO stability.



Market & Gold context (you linked gold + market live pieces)



  • Gold jumped to record highs after a surprise tariff ruling on some imported gold bars (big move; safe-haven flows + trading frictions). That tariff news also created market-wide uncertainty that affected multiple stocks and ad budgets chatter.

  • The overall tape was digesting tariffs + Fed/Federal Reserve talk + these earnings — that combo explains some of the wild intra-day swings (esp. for ad/consumer/commodity-exposed names).



Quick cheat-sheet: “Should I buy any of these right now?” (short answers)



  • Monster (MNST) — Yes if you want a relatively steady consumer growth name.

  • Block (XYZ) — Yes / Hold if you accept growth-stock volatility; raised guide = good sign.

  • Pinterest (PINS) — Buy (growth) or Hold depending on risk tolerance (valuation high).

  • fuboTV (FUBO) — Speculative Buy (turning EBITDA-positive but subscriber risk).

  • Wendy’s / Main Street — Hold (mixed signals; income or turnaround stories).

  • Trade Desk / Under Armour / Gladstone Land — Avoid or wait — big risk/uncertainty right now.



One-page Action Plans (each stock — entry / stop / rationale / size & horizon)



How to read:

• Entry = suggested entry zone as % below/above current price.

• Stop-loss = percent below your entry to limit downside.

• Position size = conservative guidance relative to a diversified portfolio.

• Horizon = short / mid / long — where the thesis plays out.


1) Monster Beverage — MNST 🟢🔥


  • Call: Buy / Core-hold

  • Entry: Buy on pullbacks within 0–8% of current price (or DCA).

  • Stop-loss: 12% below your entry.

  • Rationale: Strong margins, consistent beats; brand pricing power. Good defensive growth.

  • Position size: 3–6% of equity portfolio (larger if you want consumer staples exposure).

  • Horizon: Mid–Long term.

  • Risk level: Low–Medium (commodity/cycle risk).


2) Block — SQ(Block, Inc.) 💳🚀


  • Call: Buy / Hold depending on risk appetite

  • Entry: Enter in 0–10% pullback range; consider staggered buys (DCA).

  • Stop-loss: 15% below entry (growth volatility expected).

  • Rationale: Beat + guide raise; fintech growth story (Cash App + merchant), but still high multiple and regulatory/crypto exposure.

  • Position size: 2–5% (growth sleeve).

  • Horizon: Mid–Long term.

  • Risk level: Medium–High.


3) Pinterest — PINS 📌✨


  • Call: Buy (growth) / Hold

  • Entry: Because valuation is high, prefer buying on pullback ≥10% from current price. Use staggered buys.

  • Stop-loss: 18% below entry (valuation risk).

  • Rationale: Revenue beat and ad-product momentum but high PE; volatile on ad cycles.

  • Position size: 1–4% (growth/speculative).

  • Horizon: Mid–Long.

  • Risk level: High (valuation-sensitive).


4) fuboTV — FUBO 📺📈


  • Call: Speculative Buy

  • Entry: Buy on dips or confirmation of subscriber stabilization; target 0–12% dip windows.

  • Stop-loss: 20% (turnaround risk is real).

  • Rationale: First positive adjusted EBITDA — milestone. But subscriber churn and competition matter.

  • Position size: 1–3% (speculative bucket).

  • Horizon: Mid (turnaround) — monitor quarterly sub/EBITDA.

  • Risk level: High.


5) Wendy’s — WEN 🍔😬


  • Call: Hold / Opportunistic Buy

  • Entry: Consider buying if price falls 10–18% from current levels (gives margin for guide concerns).

  • Stop-loss: 15% below entry for holders/new buys.

  • Rationale: Franchise cash flow is durable; FY guide cut signals U.S. traffic weakness—watch comps and operational fixes.

  • Position size: 1–3% (income/cash-flow tilt).

  • Horizon: Mid–Long.

  • Risk level: Medium.


6) Main Street Capital —MAIN 🏦📈


  • Call: Hold (income investor)

  • Entry: Buy on weakness 8–15% below current price; good for yield.

  • Stop-loss: 12% — BDCs sensitive to credit shocks.

  • Rationale: Steady dividend + BDC income profile; credit-quality focus.

  • Position size: 3–6% if you want yield exposure.

  • Horizon: Long (income).

  • Risk level: Medium.


7) The Trade Desk — TTD 😬🚨


  • Call: Avoid / Wait for stability

  • Entry: Only consider re-entry after a sustained recovery or improved guidance; prefer >25% further pullback or signs of stabilization.

  • Stop-loss: 20% if you buy into recovery.

  • Rationale: Guidance scare & competitive pressure (Amazon) caused a heavy re-rate — valuation was high so downside hurt.

  • Position size: 0–2% (speculative for risk-tolerant investors).

  • Horizon: Long but uncertain — needs product/competitive proof.

  • Risk level: High.


8) Under Armour — UAA / UA👟📉


  • Call: Sell / Avoid until clarity

  • Entry: Not recommended until guidance stabilizes and tariff impact is digested. Consider >20% discount from current price for speculative entry.

  • Stop-loss: 20% if attempting a speculative trade.

  • Rationale: Tariff cost shock + weak demand + restructuring; a lot of execution risk.

  • Position size: 0–1% (if any).

  • Horizon: Mid–Long (if management executes).

  • Risk level: High.


9) Gladstone Land — LAND 🌾🔻


  • Call: Avoid / Watch

  • Entry: Wait for stabilized FFO and rent roll improvements. Speculative entry only after clear FFO recovery or large discount (>20%).

  • Stop-loss: 15–20% depending on your entry.

  • Rationale: FFO miss undermines REIT trust — needs evidence of stability.

  • Position size: 0–1% (speculative/income seekers).

  • Horizon: Mid (wait for clarity).

  • Risk level: High.



Analyst Notes & Quick “Where to see exact price targets” (summary)



  • Trade Desk: Multiple large downgrades after cautious guidance; Bank of America and several street firms cut price targets and ratings (severity varied).

  • Block: Several firms raised targets after the guide raise.

  • Monster / Pinterest / fubo: Mixed — many stays at Buy/Hold but some price target raises after beats.

  • Under Armour / Gladstone Land / Wendy’s: Negative reactions and some downgrades (or trimmed outlooks).


Comments


bottom of page