TTD DIDNT DO THEIR BEST MNST SHOWS WHY THEYRE BETTER THAN THE REST
- Mr. Bullish

- Aug 8
- 9 min read
Quick emoji TL;DR (fast snack)
Monster (MNST) — 🔥 Beat & big pop. Strong margins. Crowd: buy-ish vibes.
Block (XYZ) — 💳 Raised guides, margins looking better, S&P inclusion tailwind. Still growth-stocky.
Pinterest (PINS) — 📌 Revenue beat but choppy reaction — growth story with high PE; analysts split.
fuboTV (FUBO) — 📺 Surprise beat, first positive adjusted EBITDA — still subscriber risk.
Wendy’s (WEN) — 🍔 EPS beat, cut guide — operational headwinds in U.S. but franchise cash flow.
Main Street Capital (MAIN) — 🏦 Modest beat, steady dividend/metrics — income/credit sensitive.
The Trade Desk (TTD) — 🤯 Beat but guidance worries + heavy downgrades — big sell-off (competition fears). Watch out.
Under Armour (UAA/UA) — 📉 Miss/weak guide + tariff hit = big sell-off; restructuring noise.
Gladstone Land (LAND) — 🌾 Missed FFO, revenue lag — looks weakest here.
Ranked list (best → worst)
Monster (MNST) — 1 (best)
Block (XYZ) — 2
Pinterest (PINS) — 3
fuboTV (FUBO) — 4
Wendy’s (WEN) — 5
Main Street Capital (MAIN) — 6
The Trade Desk (TTD) — 7
Under Armour (UAA) — 8
Gladstone Land (LAND) — 9 (worst)
(Reasoning: rank uses earnings surprise, guidance, fundamentals, and how durable the business looks.)
Deep dives — one-by-one (emoji + facts + quick verdict)
Monster Beverage —MNST🟢🔥
What happened (Q2): EPS $0.52 vs consensus ~$0.48 (beat); revenue $2.11B vs $2.08B — beat. Stock jumped (+9% intraday / strong).
Why market reacted: Solid beat + strong margins; beverage businesses with brand pricing power often get re-rated when results beat.
Fundamentals (snapshot): PE ≈ ~36 (Macrotrends recent), strong net profit margins (~20%+ historically), low leverage vs peers.
Analyst view / PTs: Zacks ranks it as a Hold (Zacks Rank #3) as of the story, consensus views generally positive but not unanimous.
Big holders: Vanguard, BlackRock, major mutuals — typical institutional backing.
Short / mid / long term:
Short: Bullish — earnings beat often sparks momentum.
Mid: Neutral–Bullish — stable category, but category trends matter (consumer staples).
Long: Bullish if pricing/distribution intact.
Verdict: Buy if you want a defensive-ish consumer growth name with solid margins; Hold for conservative investors.
Block —XYZ(formerly SQ) 💳🚀
What happened (Q2): Gross profit/gross-profit growth beat and then Block raised 2025 gross profit guidance (to something like $10.17B from prior ~ $9.96B). Management called out resilience in spending; Cash App/Square segments both contributed. Reuters/Yahoo coverage highlights guidance raise.
Price reaction: Shares moved up on the guidance/beat and S&P inclusion chatter (Block added to S&P 500 recently).
Fundamentals: Current PE varies by data feed (Macrotrends shows mid-to-high 30s recently; debt/equity low–modest, P/FCF variable). Block remains a growth-at-scale fintech with crypto/cash-app exposure — so multiples reflect growth premium.
Analyst view / PTs: Mostly Buy/Overweight from a plurality of analysts; price targets raised by several shops (TD Cowen, KBW, etc.). Not unanimous (some keep Neutral).
Big holders: Vanguard, BlackRock, T. Rowe Price, etc. (institutional heavy).
Short / mid / long term:
Short: Positive (beat + guide).
Mid: Cautiously bullish — depends on Cash App monetization + merchant trends.
Long: Depends on crypto/regulatory cycles + continued consumer adoption.
Verdict: Buy/Hold depending on risk appetite — beat + guide lift confidence; still a growth name (not a value play).
Pinterest —PINS📌✨
What happened (Q2): Revenue beat (growth ~16.9% YoY in that report), ad product improvements showed up; some mixed signals on ad CPMs and user metrics; the stock experienced volatility (sell-off in some live coverage).
Why: Solid top-line growth but high valuation (PE in high double-digits / 80s in some feeds) means any “risk” (guidance or margin softness) can cause outsized moves.
Fundamentals: PE is very elevated (Macrotrends shows ~80+ recently), profit margins volatile but some quarters show strong profitability. Low leverage generally.
Analyst view / PTs: Mixed — TD Cowen, Rosenblatt, Bernstein and others have Buy/Outperform calls with PTs in the high-$30s / $40s; others trim targets or take Neutral. Average PT ~ low-$40s per aggregated sites.
Big holders: Vanguard, BlackRock, T. Rowe Price, etc.
Outlook:
Short: Volatile — depends on ad demand and CPMs.
Mid: Growth story if ad product execution continues.
Long: Could reward patient investors if monetization stays strong — but high starting multiple increases downside risk.
Verdict: Buy for growth-tolerant investors who accept valuation risk; Hold if you’re cautious.
fuboTV —FUBO📺📈
What happened (Q2): Revenue/paid subscribers roughly matched/exceeded guidance. Reported positive adjusted EBITDA for the first time and EPS beat expectations (EPS ~+$0.05 vs small negative estimate). Revenues ~$371–380M depending on outlet.
Why market reacted: Beat and positive adjusted EBITDA is a real milestone for a growth/streaming name — but subscriber declines in North America cloud the shine. Stock reaction mixed (some headlines reported a modest dip as investors parsed subscriber trends).
Fundamentals / ratios: Fubo has historically negative margins but is improving; debt/equity moderate (~0.48ish per Macrotrends), cash balance improved; first positive adjusted EBITDA is meaningful.
Analyst view / PTs: Some bullish calls given path to profitability (but the pending Hulu-related deal and pause in guidance make modeling tricky).
Big holders: Typical institutional mix (Vanguard, BlackRock and various funds) — but it’s still a smaller-cap streaming story.
Outlook:
Short: Sentiment can flip quickly (subscriber metrics matter).
Mid: If EBITDA stays positive, buyout/partnership talk could re-rate it.
Long: Depends on consolidation in streaming space.
Verdict: Speculative Buy if you want a turnaround/streaming-risk play (watch subscriber trends).
Wendy’s —WEN🍔😬
What happened (Q2): EPS $0.29 vs est $0.25 — beat; revenue ~$560.9M (small beat) BUT company cut FY profit guidance and same-store sales in U.S. were weak. Stock reaction mixed — the beat helped but lowered guide keeps pressure.
Why: Restaurants are sensitive to traffic and promo; beating one quarter but cutting guide tells you systemic softness in U.S. comps.
Fundamentals: WEN historically has franchise strength but some balance-sheet oddities (debt metrics look odd in some feeds because of franchising accounting). Dividend yield not meaningful like a utilities REIT — more of a cash-flow franchised restaurant play.
Analysts / holders: Trian (activist) is a big investor; Vanguard/BlackRock large institutional holders.
Outlook:
Short: Weak comps = headwind.
Mid: If marketing/tactical changes restore U.S. traffic, could recover.
Long: Franchise model gives durable cash flows — but operational execution matters.
Verdict: Hold unless you think new ops strategy will fix U.S. traffic.
Main Street Capital — MAIN 🏦📈
What happened (Q2): Revenue ~$144M (beat ~4.9% vs est); EPS ~$0.99 in-line with expectations. Business slowed a bit but investment income categories grew; Zacks Rank = Hold.
Why: BDC/credit-like firms are interest-rate and credit-cycle sensitive; modest beat but not dramatic.
Fundamentals: Low leverage (debt/equity ~0.12 recent), steady dividend history (appeals to income investors), P/E etc. are moderate for a BDC/SMID. Macrotrends/stockanalysis has ratio tables.
Big holders: Institutional funds — Vanguard/BlackRock among typical names listed on holders pages.
Outlook: Conservative income play; performance tied to portfolio credit quality and interest environment.
Verdict: Hold / Income — ok if you want dividend + moderate growth.
The Trade Desk — TTD😬🚨 (big red flag this week)
What happened (Q2): Reported revenue ~$694M (+19% YoY) and adjusted EPS ~$0.41 (around estimates). BUT guidance was cautious and management comments plus competitive pressure (Amazon) spooked the market — stock plunged ~30–38% after-hours. Multiple analysts cut ratings/targets (Bank of America cut target massively to $55).
Why: Ad-tech is competitive; Amazon and walled-garden ad channels make investors worry about growth sustainability. Guidance slower than prior quarter’s growth fueled panic.
Fundamentals: Historically high PE (Macrotrends shows triple-digit PE recently) and strong profit margins vs peers — but high valuation means guidance misses are punished.
Analyst view / PTs: Heavy downgrades and price-target cuts across the street (some shops cut PT drastically; a few still defend the company).
Big holders: Vanguard, Baillie Gifford, BlackRock, Edgewood, etc. institutional heavy.
Outlook:
Short: Bearish (sell-off).
Mid: Risky — needs to show it can compete vs Amazon & keep ad dollars.
Long: Could recover if ad budgets shift back and Trade Desk defends open-web ad value — but high risk.
Verdict: Avoid / Wait — unless you’re chasing a deep-value turnaround and accept high volatility.
Under Armour — UAA / UA👟📉
What happened (quarter): Revenue $1.134B; adjusted EPS tiny (miss/low); company warned of tariff impacts ($100M impact mentioned) and cut guidance (expecting YoY revenue decline in some periods). Stock plunged heavily (double-digit %).
Why: Tariff shock + weak US demand + restructuring charges = real pain. Management flagged tariff costs & restructuring items.
Fundamentals: PE in low- to mid-20s recently; leverage varies; historically volatile margins. Institutional holders include Vanguard, BlackRock and BDT (big stake).
Outlook:
Short: Bearish (guidance weak).
Mid: Risky — depends on consumer demand and whether cost cuts stick.
Long: Could rebound if brand re-acceleration works, but not low-risk.
Verdict: Sell / Avoid for most retail investors until guidance/stability returns.
Gladstone Land —LAND🌾🔻 (weakest here)
What happened (Q2): Reported an FFO loss (-$0.10) vs est +$0.03 (big miss); revenue also missed (~$12.3M vs est ~ $16M+). Shares fell.
Why: Land/REIT FFO misses matter because investors buy REITs for stable cash distributions — a negative FFO surprises distributions outlook and trust.
Fundamentals: REIT metrics — leverage and FFO depend on seasonal/ag price cycles and farm rental deals; in this report the numbers disappointed.
Big holders: Institutions (normal mix) — holdings data on Yahoo / Nasdaq / Fintel.
Outlook: Cautious — this is the most beaten-up name in your list.
Verdict: Avoid / Watch — needs clearer FFO stability.
Market & Gold context (you linked gold + market live pieces)
Gold jumped to record highs after a surprise tariff ruling on some imported gold bars (big move; safe-haven flows + trading frictions). That tariff news also created market-wide uncertainty that affected multiple stocks and ad budgets chatter.
The overall tape was digesting tariffs + Fed/Federal Reserve talk + these earnings — that combo explains some of the wild intra-day swings (esp. for ad/consumer/commodity-exposed names).
Quick cheat-sheet: “Should I buy any of these right now?” (short answers)
Monster (MNST) — Yes if you want a relatively steady consumer growth name.
Block (XYZ) — Yes / Hold if you accept growth-stock volatility; raised guide = good sign.
Pinterest (PINS) — Buy (growth) or Hold depending on risk tolerance (valuation high).
fuboTV (FUBO) — Speculative Buy (turning EBITDA-positive but subscriber risk).
Wendy’s / Main Street — Hold (mixed signals; income or turnaround stories).
Trade Desk / Under Armour / Gladstone Land — Avoid or wait — big risk/uncertainty right now.
One-page Action Plans (each stock — entry / stop / rationale / size & horizon)
How to read:
• Entry = suggested entry zone as % below/above current price.
• Stop-loss = percent below your entry to limit downside.
• Position size = conservative guidance relative to a diversified portfolio.
• Horizon = short / mid / long — where the thesis plays out.
1) Monster Beverage — MNST 🟢🔥
Call: Buy / Core-hold
Entry: Buy on pullbacks within 0–8% of current price (or DCA).
Stop-loss: 12% below your entry.
Rationale: Strong margins, consistent beats; brand pricing power. Good defensive growth.
Position size: 3–6% of equity portfolio (larger if you want consumer staples exposure).
Horizon: Mid–Long term.
Risk level: Low–Medium (commodity/cycle risk).
2) Block — SQ(Block, Inc.) 💳🚀
Call: Buy / Hold depending on risk appetite
Entry: Enter in 0–10% pullback range; consider staggered buys (DCA).
Stop-loss: 15% below entry (growth volatility expected).
Rationale: Beat + guide raise; fintech growth story (Cash App + merchant), but still high multiple and regulatory/crypto exposure.
Position size: 2–5% (growth sleeve).
Horizon: Mid–Long term.
Risk level: Medium–High.
3) Pinterest — PINS 📌✨
Call: Buy (growth) / Hold
Entry: Because valuation is high, prefer buying on pullback ≥10% from current price. Use staggered buys.
Stop-loss: 18% below entry (valuation risk).
Rationale: Revenue beat and ad-product momentum but high PE; volatile on ad cycles.
Position size: 1–4% (growth/speculative).
Horizon: Mid–Long.
Risk level: High (valuation-sensitive).
4) fuboTV — FUBO 📺📈
Call: Speculative Buy
Entry: Buy on dips or confirmation of subscriber stabilization; target 0–12% dip windows.
Stop-loss: 20% (turnaround risk is real).
Rationale: First positive adjusted EBITDA — milestone. But subscriber churn and competition matter.
Position size: 1–3% (speculative bucket).
Horizon: Mid (turnaround) — monitor quarterly sub/EBITDA.
Risk level: High.
5) Wendy’s — WEN 🍔😬
Call: Hold / Opportunistic Buy
Entry: Consider buying if price falls 10–18% from current levels (gives margin for guide concerns).
Stop-loss: 15% below entry for holders/new buys.
Rationale: Franchise cash flow is durable; FY guide cut signals U.S. traffic weakness—watch comps and operational fixes.
Position size: 1–3% (income/cash-flow tilt).
Horizon: Mid–Long.
Risk level: Medium.
6) Main Street Capital —MAIN 🏦📈
Call: Hold (income investor)
Entry: Buy on weakness 8–15% below current price; good for yield.
Stop-loss: 12% — BDCs sensitive to credit shocks.
Rationale: Steady dividend + BDC income profile; credit-quality focus.
Position size: 3–6% if you want yield exposure.
Horizon: Long (income).
Risk level: Medium.
7) The Trade Desk — TTD 😬🚨
Call: Avoid / Wait for stability
Entry: Only consider re-entry after a sustained recovery or improved guidance; prefer >25% further pullback or signs of stabilization.
Stop-loss: 20% if you buy into recovery.
Rationale: Guidance scare & competitive pressure (Amazon) caused a heavy re-rate — valuation was high so downside hurt.
Position size: 0–2% (speculative for risk-tolerant investors).
Horizon: Long but uncertain — needs product/competitive proof.
Risk level: High.
8) Under Armour — UAA / UA👟📉
Call: Sell / Avoid until clarity
Entry: Not recommended until guidance stabilizes and tariff impact is digested. Consider >20% discount from current price for speculative entry.
Stop-loss: 20% if attempting a speculative trade.
Rationale: Tariff cost shock + weak demand + restructuring; a lot of execution risk.
Position size: 0–1% (if any).
Horizon: Mid–Long (if management executes).
Risk level: High.
9) Gladstone Land — LAND 🌾🔻
Call: Avoid / Watch
Entry: Wait for stabilized FFO and rent roll improvements. Speculative entry only after clear FFO recovery or large discount (>20%).
Stop-loss: 15–20% depending on your entry.
Rationale: FFO miss undermines REIT trust — needs evidence of stability.
Position size: 0–1% (speculative/income seekers).
Horizon: Mid (wait for clarity).
Risk level: High.
Analyst Notes & Quick “Where to see exact price targets” (summary)
Trade Desk: Multiple large downgrades after cautious guidance; Bank of America and several street firms cut price targets and ratings (severity varied).
Block: Several firms raised targets after the guide raise.
Monster / Pinterest / fubo: Mixed — many stays at Buy/Hold but some price target raises after beats.
Under Armour / Gladstone Land / Wendy’s: Negative reactions and some downgrades (or trimmed outlooks).










Comments